Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiv v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiv v. M/S.nagarseth Shipbreakers

High Court 02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiv v. M/S.nagarseth Shipbreakers
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiv v. M/S.nagarseth Shipbreakers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1119 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1119 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Nagarseth Shipbreakers .. Respondent Ms.P.B.Bhosale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.Jitendra Singh i/by Mr.K.Gopal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2008 DATE : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. By consent Appeal is taken up for hearing. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Both the learned Counsel categorically state that in the assessee’s own case for the earlier assessment year i.e.Income Tax Appeal (L) No.635/2004, the same question of law (as is involved in this Appeal) was raised, and this Court by an order dated 16.07.2007 has dismissed the said Appeal holding thereby that there was no substantial question of law involved. In view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain the present Appeal. Appeal stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan