In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xvi v. M/S. Gitanjali Exports Corporation, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the notice of motion and the review petition are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF M OTION NO. 628 OF 2010INREVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 16 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4100 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI.v.M/s. Gitanjali Exports Corporation.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.A. R. Malhotra for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 15TH JANUARY, 2013
PC:
Counsel for the revenue states that he has instructions to withdraw the notice of motion as well as review petition. Accordingly, the notice of motion and the review petition are dismissed as withdrawn.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue