In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xvi v. M/S. M.r. Bhansali And Co, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.627 OF 2010IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 18 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3844 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI.v.
M/s. M.R. Bhansali and Co.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the Appellant.
Ms. Sneha Phene with Prital Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.15TH JANUARY, 2013
DATE :
PC:
By consent, notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed of.
2)Review petition be placed on board on 21/1/2013.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue