In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xvi v. M/S.c. Mahendra Exports, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1184 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1185 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – XVI
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.C. Mahendra Exports
..Respondent.
Mr.K.R. Chaudhary for the appellant.Ms.A. Vissanji for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court dated 18[th] February 2009 in the case of the CIT – 20 V/s. M/s.Amber Exports (India).
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue