The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xvi v. Shyam H. Mariwala
High Court
16 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xvi v. Shyam H. Mariwala
Date of order
16 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xvi v. Shyam H. Mariwala, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both the appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.550 OF 2008
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.551 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax - XVI
..Appellant.
Versus
Shyam H. Mariwala
..Respondent.
Ms.Anuradha Mane with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 16[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the tribunal has taken similar view in the case of Madhav M. Mariwala. He further fairly states that so far as Madhavi’s appeal is concerned, the same is already disposed of by the Division Bench of this court vide order dated 28[th ]April 2009 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.553 of 2008. Following similar order, appeal of Mr.Madhav Mariwala was also came to be rejected. Photocopy of earlier orders referred to above is taken on record.
2.In this view of the matter, present appeals are also liable to be dismissed for the reasons recorded in that appeal. Both the appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue