The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi v. Rajendra Shah
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi v. Rajendra Shah
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi v. Rajendra Shah, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.783 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.783 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-XXVI .. Appellant
Vs.
Rajendra Shah .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant-revenue. As the tax effect involved in this
case is less than Rs.4 lakhs, the learned Counsel for
the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal.
Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and
dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded
to the Appellant as per the rules.
2. In view of withdrawal of the Appeal itself, nothing
further survives in the Notice of Motion No.1808/2007.
Hence, the Notice of Motion No.1808/2007 also stands
dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.