The Commissioner Of Income-Taxaayakar Bhavan v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009
High Court
05 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Taxaayakar Bhavan v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009
Date of order
05 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Taxaayakar Bhavan v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 477 OF 2007.
The Commissioner of Income-taxAayakar Bhavan..... Appellant.Vs.Rajarambapu Patil SahakariSakhar Karkhana Ltd.Sakharale,Tal-Walwa..... Respondent.
Mr Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr S.N. Inamdar, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: V.C. DAGA,ANDANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.DATED: 5TH JANUARY, 2009.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned counsel for theParties.2.The questions of law sought to be raisedin the present appeal have already beendecided by this Court in the case of CIT v.Manager, Shetkari Sahakari Karkhana Ltd 2008301 ITR 191 (Bom).In this view of thematter, no substantial question of law isinvolved in this appeal. The appeal isdismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue