Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Suresh R. Singh

High Court 11 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Suresh R. Singh
Date of order
11 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Suresh R. Singh, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1149 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai... Appellant Vs Shri Suresh R. singh .. Respondent Mr. R.G. Bhat i/by Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.,& A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for theappellant. The appeal is directed against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal dated 29[th] January, 2004 where upon appreciationof the records produced before the authority, it accepted the appeal ofthe assessee on the ground that there was no direct nexus with anymaterial found as a result of search in relation to the books ofaccounts or documents or any other material relating to the blockassessment proceeding. While coming to this finding of fact, the Tribunal has also relied upon nearly nine judgments referred to in theorder which have taken consistent view. The entry made on the basisof the information was ordered to be deleted but still, the Tribunalmaintained that the assessee had himself filed return of undisclosedincome declaring total undisclosed income at Rs.94,350/-, the samewas ordered to be taken as undisclosed income. In our consideredopinion, no question of law much less a substantial question of lawarises in this appeal. Dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan