Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral-Ii...

The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhavani Gems

High Court 03 May 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhavani Gems
Date of order
03 May 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhavani Gems, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1408 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral-III, Mumbai ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Bhavani Gems..Respondent. .... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Deepak Tralshawala with Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Respondent..... CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. P.C.: 3 May, 2010. The Appeal has been admitted on the following substantial question of law : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was legally correct in treating interest income earned by the assessee on fixed deposits kept with Banks as ‘Business Income’ instead of ‘Income From Other Sources’ and allowing netting of interest for the purpose of deduction u/s. 80HHC of the Act?” Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee and counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue are agreed in stating before the Court that in view of the judgments of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Asian Star Company Ltd. (ITA 200 of 2009 decided on 18/19 March 2010) and in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Swani Spice Mills Pvt. Ltd. (ITA 1019 of 2007 decided on 19 April 2010) the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 29 May 2006 may be set aside and the appeal may be remitted back to the Tribunal for decision in the light of the aforesaid judgments. In view of the statement made before the Court, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 29 May 2006 to that extent is set aside and ITA 4098/Mum/2004 shall stand restored to the file of the Tribunal for decision on the aforesaid issue in view of the judgments of this Court. The Appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan