In The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Marico Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.434 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral III, Mumbai
: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Marico Industries Ltd.
: Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan Advocate for AppellantMr. A.K. Jasani Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
S.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 27.8.2008
P.C.
.
Heard the learned advocate for the appellant.
dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded
to the appellant as per rule.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.