The Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iv, Mumbai v. Nitco Tiles Ltd

bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6953 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral IV, Mumbai … Appellant v/s NITCO Tiles ltd. … Respondent Mr.Arvind Pinto for the appellant. Ms.Beena Pillai for the respondent. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2014 P. C. : 1Having heard Mr.Pinto, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and perusing with his assistance the order under challenge, we are of the opinion that this appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. The Tribunal has followed its earlier orders in the case of very assessee. In the prior assessment years in question, the Tribunal had granted similar relief. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted. That exercise carried out by the Tribunal has been upheld by this Court. The orders passed by the Tribunal in the case of this very assessee have been upheld in Income Tax Appeal No. 280 of 2008 with Income Tax Appeal No.284 of 2008 decided on 7[th] August, 2008. Ms.Beena Pillai had handed over a compilation of these orders to us. The orders passed on 7[th ]August, 2008 have been followed by another Division Bench and for subsequent years in Income Tax Appeal No.3713 of 2009, dated 6[th ]August, 2010. Even the attempt to have this order reviewed has failed as is clear from the Review Petition (L) No.156 of 2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.415 of 2010 decided on 28[th] February, 2013. For all these reasons, we are of the view that this present appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is accordingly dismissed. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)