The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Bahadur Chand Investment (P)Ltd., Ludhiana
High Court
29 May 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Bahadur Chand Investment (P)Ltd., Ludhiana
Date of order
29 May 2008
Assessment year(s)
1986-87
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Bahadur Chand Investment (P)Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: The reference application is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITR No.93 of 1996Date of decision:29.5.2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax,(Central) Ludhiana
......Applicant
Versus
M/s Bahadur Chand Investment (P)Ltd., Ludhiana
......Respondent
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
* * *
Present:Shri Krishan Mehta, Advocate for the applicant-revenue.Shri Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the respondent-assessee.
* * *
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J .
On the application filed by the revenue, the Tribunal vide itsorder dated 22.1.1996 passed in RA No.247/Chandi/1995 arising out ofITA No.542/Chandi/1990 for the assessment year 1986-87 has referred thefollowing question of law said to be arising out of the Tribunal's orderdated 9.3.1995, to this Court for its opinion:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in lawin holding that the assessee be treated as an “IndustrialCompany” and that the tax be charged at low rateapplicable to an Industrial Company?”
Sh. Krishan Mehta, learned counsel for the revenue, has very
fairly stated that similar question of law on similar facts has been answeredby this Court against the revenue in ITR No.287 of 1995 decided on21.5.2008.
In view of the above, question of law as referred by theTribunal is answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.
The reference application is disposed of accordingly.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
May 29, 2008ps
(RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.