Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Om Parkash Sudershan Kumari, Ludhiana

High Court 04 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

04 Jul 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Om Parkash Sudershan Kumari, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH TTR1051999Decided on : 04.07.2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana | VERSUS ..... Appellant M/s Om Parkash Sudershan Kumari, Ludhiana ..... Respondent CORAM2-34BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 2-34BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL PresentMr.Zora Singh Klar, Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant-Department. Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent. <<<<<<< S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- Department seeks leave to withdraw the reference on the ground that the taxeffect is less than the amount of Rs.20 lacs and in view of Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, The reference is accordingly disposed of, Needless to add that this order would not affect the rights and the contentions of the parties on the questions of law or of fact in otherappropriate proceedings. 1 S.J. VAZIFDAR | ACTING CHIEE JUSTICE 04.07.2016 | DEEPAK SIBAL | JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.