The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Om Parkash Sudershan Kumarifamily Trust, Ludhiana
High Court
04 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Om Parkash Sudershan Kumarifamily Trust, Ludhiana
Date of order
04 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Om Parkash Sudershan Kumarifamily Trust, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
LTR2)1998
sr. No.302 (7)
Decided on : 04.07.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana |
VERSUS
..... Appellant
M/s Om Parkash Sudershan KumariFamily Trust, Ludhiana |
..... Respondent
CORAMHON7BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON7BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Zora Singh Klar, Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant-Department.
Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.
>>>>>>>
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-
Department seeks leave to withdraw the reference on the ground that the taxeffect is less than the amount of Rs.20 lacs and in view of Circular No|
21/2015, dated 10.12.2015,
The reference is accordingly disposed of,
Needless to add that this order would not affect the rights and
the contentions of the parties on the questions of law or of fact in otherappropriate proceedings.
1 S.J. VAZIFDAR |
ACTING CHIEE JUSTICE
04.07.2016
shamsher
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.