The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. Sh. Pankaj Munjal
High Court
04 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. Sh. Pankaj Munjal
Date of order
04 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana v. Sh. Pankaj Munjal, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
TTR161995
sr. No.302 (4)
Decided on : 04.07.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana
VERSUS
..... Appellant
Sh. Pankaj Munjal
..... Respondent
CORAMHON3BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON3BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Zora Singh Klar, Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant-Department.
Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.
=======
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-
Department seeks leave to withdraw the reference on the ground that the taxeffect is less than the amount of Rs.20 lacs and in view of Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015,
The reference is accordingly disposed of,
Needless to add that this order would not affect the rights andthe contentions of the parties on the questions of law or of fact in otherappropriate proceedings.
1 S.J. VAZIFDAR |
ACTING CHIEE JUSTICE
04.07.2016
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue