The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Patna v. Dr. Shakti Shankar Verma
High Court
07 Nov 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Patna v. Dr. Shakti Shankar Verma
Date of order
07 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Patna v. Dr. Shakti Shankar Verma, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 439 of 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna ...... Petitioner
Vs.
Dr. Shakti Shankar Verma.
... Respondent
------
CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
----
For the Appellants: Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr. S.C.(I.T) Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rupa Kumari, Adv.
For the Respondent: ----
th November, 2012
------ Dated 7
Delay in filing this restoration petition is condoned in view of the fact that the Tax Appeal No. 36 of 2006 was dismissed without notice to the parties and there is no need to issue notice to the respondent on the application for condonation of delay.
In view of the reasons given in the order dated 19[th ]September, 2012 passed in C.M.P No. 452 of 2011 (The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna Vs. Jai Prakash Singhania) and in view of the similar facts involved in the dismissal of the Tax Appeal No. 36 of 2006, this C.M.P is allowed and Tax Appeal No. 36 of 2006 is restored to its original number.
(Prakash Tatia, C J)
(Jaya Roy , J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.