Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v....

The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Mr.raju Tejumal Jethwani

High Court 07 Aug 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Mr.raju Tejumal Jethwani
Date of order
07 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Mr.raju Tejumal Jethwani, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Placing on record such submission, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

TCA No.710 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No.710 of 2017 The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai.. Appellant -vs- Mr.Raju Tejumal Jethwani.. Respondent Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 08.09.2016 passed in ITA No.1124/Mds/2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “A” Bench, Chennai for the Assessment Year 2012-13. For Appellant: Mr.RajasekarFor Respondent : Mr.R.Sandeep Bagmar JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by the Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue. Mr.R.Sandeep Bagmar appears for the respondent/Assessee. Page 1 of 3 TCA No.710 of 2017 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law proposed may be kept open for consideration in appropriate case. 3. Placing on record such submission, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 07.08.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/No ss To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai Chennai Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3 TCA No.710 of 2017THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ss TCA No.710 of 2017 07.08.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan