The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.3I Infotech Limited(J&B Software India P Ltdmerged With 3I Infotech Limited)Tower
High Court
25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.3I Infotech Limited(J&B Software India P Ltdmerged With 3I Infotech Limited)Tower
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.3I Infotech Limited(J&B Software India P Ltdmerged With 3I Infotech Limited)Tower, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A, Section 44AB of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: No Appearance JUDGMENT (delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.) The above tax case appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law: “1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that exclusion of expenses in foreign currency in respect of foreign t...
Decision: In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDARandTHE NONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
T.C.A. No.761 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai
.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.3i Infotech Limited(J&B Software India P LtdMerged with 3i Infotech Limited)Tower No.5, 3rd Floor to 6th FloorInternational Infotech Park, VashiNavi Mumbai - 400 703
.. Respondent
* * *
Prayer : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "B" Bench, Chennai dated 07.05.2013 passed in I.T.A.21/Mds/2013.
* * *
For Appellant
: Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Sr. Standing Counsel
For Respondent
: Served. No Appearance
JUDGMENT
(delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)
The above tax case appeal has been admitted on the following
substantial questions of law:
“1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that exclusion of expenses in foreign currency in respect of foreign travel amounting to Rs.71.46 lakhs and telecommunication charges amounting to Rs.28.10 lakhs from the export turnover which computing deduction u/s.10A?
2. Whether the Tribunal was right in determining the ALP by making a upward transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.5.23 crores especially when DRP had upheld the action of AO?
3. Is not the finding of the Tribunal wrong by holding that for the purpose of segment wise working of the assessee account need not be audited especially when section 44AB clearly states that if the total turnover of the assessee company exceeds Rs.45 lakhs the same is to be audited?
2. Learned senior standing counsel appearing for the appellant in the
appeal submitted that the amount involved in the present appeal is below the
monetary limit as per the circulars issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis________Page 2/4
T.C.A. No.761 of 2013
Circular No. 5/2024 and 09/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and 17.09.2024 respectively.
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the substantial questions of law are left open. No costs.
AsrIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/No
[S.S.S.R., J.] [C.S.N., J.]25.02.2025
S.S.SUNDAR, J.and
C.SARAVANAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis________Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis________Page 4/4
T.C.A. No.761 of 2013
Asr
T.C.A. No.761 of 2013
Dated : 25.02.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.