The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.ab Medical Centres Ltd.,Ali Towers, 3[Rd] Floor
High Court
22 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.ab Medical Centres Ltd.,Ali Towers, 3[Rd] Floor
Date of order
22 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.ab Medical Centres Ltd.,Ali Towers, 3[Rd] Floor, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.174 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai .. Appellant
Versus
M/s.AB Medical Centres LTD.,Ali Towers, 3[rd] Floor, No.55,Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.
.. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras `C' Bench, Chennaidated 25.09.2013, passed in I.T.A.No.1273/Mds/2013 for theassessment year 2006-2007 against the order of the Commissionerof Income Tax (Appeals)VI, Chennai 34, made in ITA No.71/12-13,dated 27.12.2012 against the order of the Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax, company circle 1(1), Chennai, dated 29.08.2008 .
For Appellant
: Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarsskTo:1.The Registrar, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)VI,Chennai 34.3. The Deputy Commissioner of Incoem Tax,Company circle, 1(1)Chennai.+1 cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar, Advocate, sr.4702Tax Case Appeal No.174 of 2015vgi cokra 16.02.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.