Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.avigna Housing Pvt. Ltd.,Plot

High Court 11 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.avigna Housing Pvt. Ltd.,Plot
Date of order
11 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.avigna Housing Pvt. Ltd.,Plot, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A. No.454 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANTax Case Appeal No.454 of 2021 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. .. Appellant -vs- M/s.Avigna Housing Pvt. Ltd.,Plot No.1822, 1st Block,13th Main Road, Anna Nagar,Chenani 600 040.PAN: .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 31.12.2020 passed in ITA No.521/Mds/2019 on the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai for the Assessment Year 2015-16. For Appellant :Mr.T.RavikumarSr. Stdg. Counsel : Mr.R.Sivaraman For Respondent : Page 1 of 4 T.C.A. No.454 of 2021 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mr.Ravikumar states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that leave be given to withdraw the appeal. 2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. 3. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. IndexNeutral Citation (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)11.06.2025 : Yes/No: Yes/No sra Page 2 of 4 To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench. Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. Chennai. Page 3 of 4 T.C.A. No.454 of 2021 Page 4 of 4 T.C.A. No.454 of 2021The Hon'ble Chief Justiceand Sunder Mohan, J. (sra) T.C.A. No.454 of 2021 11.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan