The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.dart Express India Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.09.2018 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMandTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.1127 to 1129 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. .. Appellant in all the appeals Vs. M/s.Dart Express India Ltd.,29, LDG Road, Little Mount,Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. .. Respondent Prayer : Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench, dated 14.12.2007 in ITA Nos.1574/Mds/2006,2030/Mds/2006 and 2321/Mds/2006 for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, 2002-2003 and 2003-2004respectively. * * * For Appellant in all : Mr.T.Ravikumarthe appeals Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent in : Mr.R.Sivaramanall the appeals C O M M O N J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.]Heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel forthe respondent. 2.These appeals have been filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 14.12.2007 in ITANos.1574/Mds/2006, 2030/Mds/2006 and 2321/Mds/2006 for the Assessment Year 2001-2002,2002-2003 and 2003-2004 respectively. 3. The above appeals have been admitted on 30.07.2008 on the following substantial questions oflaw : �1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the cashpaid as speed monies to the officials in contradiction to the explanation to Section 37(1) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 ? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the disallowance of excessive and unreasonable marketing fee paid, as per Section 40(A)(2)(a) of theAct, to the specified/related company as mentioned in Section 40(A)(2)(b) of the Act ?� 4. It may not be necessary for us to answer the above substantial questions of law, as the monetarylimit involved in these appeals is lesser than the amount fixed by the circular instructions issued bythe Central Board of Direct Taxes. This Court had an occasion to consider the effect of that circularin TCA.No.395 of 2018 dated 24.7.2018, the relevant portions of which, are as follows : �4. Further, it is relevant to note that by Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.7.2018, monetary limit hasfurther been increased and appeals be maintainable before the High Courts. It has been increased toRs.50,00,000/-. Hence, viewed from any angle, this appeal could not have been filed. 5. Thus, by applying the above Circular issued by the CBDT, this appeal ought not to have been filedby the Revenue and hence, for that reason, this tax case appeal is dismissed and the substantialquestions of law, framed for consideration, are left open.� 5. In the light of the above, the above appeals are dismissed. No costs. The substantial questions oflaw are left open for consideration. (T.S.S., J.) (V.B.S., J.) 03.09.2018 gg To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. 3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),Chennai. T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.andV.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J. gg 03.09.2018