Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd.,Pb

High Court 10 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd.,Pb
Date of order
10 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S.railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd.,Pb, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai : Appellant versus M/s.Railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd.,PB No.259/LB, Ashok Vihar Complex,Old Zoo Road, Near Central Railway Station,Chennai 600 003PAN AADAT7303F : Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “C” Bench Chennai dated 02.01.2019 in ITA.No.1136/Chny/2018, ITA.No.1137/Chny/2018 and ITA.No.1138/Chny/2018 For Appellant :Ms.R.Hemalatha,Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent :Mr.G.Baskar Page 1 of 4 TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Ms.Hemalatha states that the monetary limit involved in these appeals is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular F.No.390/Misc/30/2023-JC, dated 02.11.2023. Counsel says that she has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeals. 2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. 3. The Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)10.06.2025 IndexNeutral Citationtar : Yes/No: Yes/No Page 2 of 4 To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Chennai 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “C” Bench Chennai Madras “C” Bench Chennai Page 3 of 4 TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 Page 4 of 4 TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEand SUNDER MOHAN, J. (tar) TCA Nos.398 to 400 of 2021 10.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan