The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Ramaniyam Ganesh
High Court
01 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Ramaniyam Ganesh
Date of order
01 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Ramaniyam Ganesh, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction claimed u/s.80IB(10)?
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.919 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai...Appellant
Vs.
Ramaniyam Ganesh..Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras"D"Bench,Chennaidated26.08.2011in I.T.A.No.1887/Mds/2010.
For the Appellant:Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:
Mr.A.S.Sriraman
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
The present tax case appeal was admitted on 07.12.2015 by this Court on the following substantial questions of law:-
"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction claimed u/s.80IB(10)?
2. Whether the finding of the Tribunal relating to eligible profit on account of transfer of partner's land to the firm by applying the provisions u/s.80IA(13) r/w. Section 80IB(10) is proper and relief is to be allowed?
3. Whether the legal fiction in Section 45(3) can be extended to the provisions of Section 80IB(10) and relief granted to the assessee?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Scheme dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the
low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 01.10.2024
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.919 of 2015
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.(drm)
T.C.A.No.919 of 2015
01.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.