Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri P.jawarilal Jain87

High Court 16 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri P.jawarilal Jain87
Date of order
16 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri P.jawarilal Jain87, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.11.2016 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAOANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Tax Case (Appeal) No.1246 of 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. ... Appellant Vs. Shri P.Jawarilal Jain87/4, Harrington Road,Chetpet, Chennai-600 031. ...Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Sec. 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 16.03.2007 in ITA No.1496/Mds/2004. For Appellant For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar, Senior Standing Counsel : Not Ready in Notice. **** JUDGMENT (JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS DELIVERED BY NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.) The Tax Case Appeal has been admitted on 26.09.2007 for consideration of the following two substantial questions of law: (i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding not only the face value of the value declared under VDIS is to be as the undisclosed income of the assessee for this assessment year 1998-99? NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J and Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J gr. (ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that where the assessment was re-opened using materials furnished during the VDIS (which failed due to non payment of tax), all facts stated therein have to be taken as true, and the assessee need not furnish any further proof? 2. Though substantial questions of law do arise for consideration, however, the value involved in the appeal is far-too insignificant particularly viewed in the backdrop of the circular instructions passed on through Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 by the Department. 3. It is now decided that an appeal shall not be filed in case where tax effect does not exceed Rs.20 lakhs. In the instant case, tax effect is less than the limit of Rs.20 lakhs prescribed in the said circular and hence, this appeal is not pressed rightly by the learned Standing counsel Mr.T.Ravikumar. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appal stands dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case. No cost. (N.R.R.J.) (A.S.M.,J.) 16.11.2016 gr. T.C.A.NO.1246 OF 2007 http://www.judis.nic.in
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan