The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Smt Vandana Suresh Bhandarino
High Court
03 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Smt Vandana Suresh Bhandarino
Date of order
03 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Smt Vandana Suresh Bhandarino, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-03-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
TCA NO. 381 of 2021
The Commissioner Of Income TaxChennai..Appellant
Vs
Smt Vandana Suresh BhandariNo.44/3 Narayana Mudali Street,Sowcarpet, Chennai-600079
...Respondent
Prayer : This Appeal is filed under Memorandum of Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19.03.2020 in ITA No. 2854/Chny/2019.
For Appellant: Mr. T.Ravi KumarFor Respondent: M/s. G.Vardini Karthik
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
Learned counsels appearing on either side state that the assessee has availed the benefit under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and submitted Form I and the assessee also received Form II. It is also represented that From III has been
S.S.SUNDAR,J. and
C.SARAVANAN, J.
ak
received and the payment intimation has been given to the assessee. Hence, the learned senior standing counsel appearing for the appellant department seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side,
this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. In case, for any reason, the assessee has failed to pay the amount, liberty is preserved to the department to seek restoration of this appeal.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.)
03-03-2025
Index : YesInternet :Yes/Noak
TCA NO. 381 of 2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.