The Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle -1, Tirupur v. M/S.eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle -1, Tirupur v. M/S.eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle -1, Tirupur v. M/S.eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the construction of a building as revenue expense, when even renovation or extension to such building has been defined as a capital expense in Explanation 1 to Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.67 of 2022
The Commissioner of Income TaxCircle -1, Tirupur...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd.No.10, 12, 2[nd] StreetKumar Nagar South, Tirupur 641 603PAN: AACCC 0952 E..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D”Bench,Chennaidated09.08.2021passedin I.T.A.No.2227/CHNY/2018.
For the Appellant
:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:Ms.A.Sharrenfor Mr.R.Sivaraman
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 21.02.2022 by
this Court on the following substantial questions of law:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that expenditure on construction of building on leasehold land is revenue expenditure, whereas the said expenditure is of capital in nature?
2. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in ignoring the fact that the enduring benefit, a settled concept had flown to the assessee and hence, the expense was capital in nature?
3. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the construction of a building as revenue expense, when even renovation or extension to such building has been defined as a capital expense in Explanation 1 to Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
T.C.A.No.67 of 2022
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
T.C.A.No.67 of 2022
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.
(drm)
T.C.A.No.67 of 2022
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.