Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxcity Vii,...

The Commissioner Of Income Taxcity Vii, Mumbai v. M/S Navnit Motors Ltd.respts

High Court 28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxcity Vii, Mumbai v. M/S Navnit Motors Ltd.respts, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1378 OF 2008in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.458 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income TaxCity VII, Mumbai.. Appellant Vs. M/s Navnit Motors Ltd.Respts Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantNone for Respondents CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 28th April, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Nonefor the respondents. By this notice of motion,the appellant is seeking condonation of 38 daysdelay caused in filing the appeal. For thereasons stated in the affidavit in support of thenotice of motion, sufficient cause is made out forcondonation of delay, and there is no caseofinaction, negligence or want of bonafide on thepart of the appellant. Hence, the notice ofmotion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). 2. Place the appeal on board for admission in themonth of September, 2008 subject to numbering,. (A.V.Nirgude, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.