Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxerode v. T...

The Commissioner Of Income Taxerode v. The Kodumudi Growers Co-Operative

High Court 15 Jun 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxerode v. The Kodumudi Growers Co-Operative
Date of order
15 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxerode v. The Kodumudi Growers Co-Operative, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 15/6/2016 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice S.ManikumarandThe Honourable Mr.Justice D.Krishnakumar Tax Case Appeal No.1983 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income TaxErode.... Appellant Vs The Kodumudi Growers Co-operative Bank Ltd6/64 Bazar StreetKodumudi 638 151....Respondent Prayer:Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 19/3/2008 in ITA No.220 (Mds)2008. For appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax. For respondent : M/s.G.R.Associates- - - - - - J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) This Appeal has been filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Madras, dated 19/3/2008. 2. The substantial questions of law raised in the instant appeal are:- “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Tribunal is right in law in holding that deduction under Section 80P(2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act is to be allowed in respect of interest income received from Indira Vikas Patra? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Tribunal is right in law in not considering the fact that the judgment relied on by it in the case of CIT-Vs-Ratnagiri District Co- operative Bank Ltd reported in 254 ITR page 697 (BOM) is distinguishable on facts as it was a case wherein IVKs were purchased out of funds generated from banking business while so in the present case it is admittedly the interest income earned was from income other sources and not business income?” 3. Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax submitted that the tax implication in the instant appeal is less than the ceiling limit fixed by the Circular bearing No.21 of 2015, dated 10/12/2015. He further submitted that as per the Circular, Tax Case Appeals have been instructed to be withdrawn, subject to the matters covered under the circular. 4. Placing on record the above submissions, while dismissing the Tax Case Appeal No.1983 of 2008, as withdrawn, substantial questions of law raised are left open. No costs. mvs. (S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 15[th] June 2016. 4 S.MANIKUMAR,J a n d D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J mvs. Tax Case Appeal No.1983 of 2008 15/6/2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan