In The Commissioner Of Income Taxiv Mumbai v. M/S. Pamis Tex Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.981 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxIV Mumbai
:Appellant
v/s
M/s. Pamis Tex Pvt. Ltd.
:Respondents
Mrs. Devki Iyer i/b Mr. Vimal Gupta Advocate forAppellantNone for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 27.8.2008
P.C.
.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
that he has not been even given the brief in the
matter by the Appellant revenue.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.