Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxiv, Nagpur...

The Commissioner Of Income Taxiv, Nagpur v. M/S. Acharya Brothers, Nagpur

High Court 27 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxiv, Nagpur v. M/S. Acharya Brothers, Nagpur
Date of order
27 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxiv, Nagpur v. M/S. Acharya Brothers, Nagpur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MCA NO. 850/2013 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2013 -(The Commissioner of Income TaxIV, Nagpur vs. M/s. Acharya Brothers, Nagpur) Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. FEBRUARY 27, 2015. Heard Shri Parchure, learned counsel for thereview applicant/ original appellant. The similar review sought by the departmentin identical matter i.e. in MCA No. 851 of 2013 inIncome Tax Appeal No. 1 of 2013 (The Commissioner ofIncome Tax – 1 Aaykar Bhavan, Nagpur vs. M/s. GSAPetroleum, Nagpur) has been dismissed by this Benchonly on 28.01.2015. Here, Income-Tax AppellateTribunal has followed the judgment in the case ofMerilyn Shipping and Transports, Vishakhapatnama vs.Additional Commissioner (Special Bench) and remandedthe matter. The Review applicant attempts todemonstrate that said judgment of Special Bench isstayed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court and Gujaratand Calcatta High Court have taken a contrary view afternoticing said Special Bench. However, different views cannot be a ground for review. We did not find any fault in the order ofremand which was passed, to facilitate consideration offresh material. Hence, prayer for review is misconceived.Miscellaneous Civil Application is rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan