Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. Madura Coats Ltd.,New Jail Road,Madurai-625 001

High Court 22 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. Madura Coats Ltd.,New Jail Road,Madurai-625 001
Date of order
22 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. Madura Coats Ltd.,New Jail Road,Madurai-625 001, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 22.06.2018 Coram The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESHand The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Tax Case (Appeal) No.473 of 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Madurai. Vs. ... Appellant Madura Coats Ltd.,New Jail Road,Madurai-625 001. ... Respondent Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench dated 02.04.2001 in ITA.No.322/Mds/1988. For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan Standing Counsel for Income Tax For Respondent : Ms.Manasa for M/s King & Partridge J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) The Revenue has filed this appeal as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench dated 02.04.2001 in ITA.No.322/Mds/1988 relating to the assessment years 1985-1986. http://www.judis.nic.in 2. This Court admitted the above Tax case Appeal on 22.06.2010 on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the power house will come within the scope of the expression “other stationery plant” under item III (iv)(i) of Appendix-I to the Income Tax Rules, 1962 and is eligible for fee extra shift allowance? 3. A perusal of the question of law framed and also raised would show that they did not even arise for consideration on the facts of the case. When this query was put to the counsels, they also acknowledged the said position. In such view of the same, the tax case appeal stands dismissed and we make it clear that we are not going into the question of law as framed, which is accordingly left open to be decided in the appropriate case. No costs. (M.M.S.,J.) (N.A.V.,J.) 22/06/2018 Index:Yes/No raa To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Cir.-II, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) I, Madurai. 3.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench A, Chennai. M.M.SUNDRESH, J.and N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. raa T.C.(A) No.473 of 2010 22.06.2018
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan