The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai City 9, Mumbai v. M/S.clean Air Projects(I)Pvt.ltd
High Court
04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai City 9, Mumbai v. M/S.clean Air Projects(I)Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai City 9, Mumbai v. M/S.clean Air Projects(I)Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence,the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.443 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai City 9, Mumbai....Appellant
vs.
M/s.Clean Air Projects(I)Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.444 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai City 9, Mumbai....Appellant
M/s.Clean Air Projects(I)Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.
Mr.Sureshkumar, for appellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: 4[th] September,2008.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. The tribunal has recorded finding of factthat erection and commissioning of the plant is
intricately connected with the manufacturingactivities of the assessee. This being a finding offacts, in our opinion, no fault can be found with theorder impugned. No question of law arises. Hence,the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue