Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax)Mumbai Ci...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax)Mumbai City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Ferrel Anand Machinery Lfgs. Ltd

High Court 08 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax)Mumbai City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Ferrel Anand Machinery Lfgs. Ltd
Date of order
08 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax)Mumbai City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Ferrel Anand Machinery Lfgs. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY+ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1262 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income-Tax)Mumbai City-II, Mumbai).. Appellant Versus M/s Ferrel Anand Machinery Lfgs. Ltd. ).. Respondent None present for the Appellant. CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A. P. DESHPANDE, J.DATE:8TH JULY 2008. P.C. This Appeal has been directed against the order of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 26[th] April 2000. Vide this order, theAppeal preferred by the assessee was partially accepted and theTribunal held that, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case,disallowance at the rate of 10% of the total expenses claimed by theassessee for each year under Appeal could not be said to be on a higher side and on findings of facts the same was accepted while otherreliefs were rejected. The Appellant, vide this Appeal, has challengedthis order in the present Appeal on the questions of law suggested. Inour view, no question of law much less substantial question of lawarises in the present Appeal. On the contrary, the finding is totallybased upon appreciation of evidence and facts of the case. Moreover,the impact of revenue is very small. 2.Nobody is present on behalf of the Appellant. Appealdismissed for default. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan