Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai Cit...

The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai City Iii, Mumbai v. Shri Anil D. Ambani

High Court 23 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai City Iii, Mumbai v. Shri Anil D. Ambani, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 279 of 2003 The Commissioner of Income taxMumbai City III, Mumbai : Appellant v/s Shri Anil D. Ambani : Respondents Mr. P.S.Sahadevan Advocate for appellantMr. Sanjiv M. Shah Advocate for respondents Coram : Dr.S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date: 23.7.2008 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per rules. S.J. Kathawalla,J. Dr.S. Radhakrishnan,J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.