The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City, Mumbai v. Indian Express Newspapers,(Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd.express Towers, Nariman Point,Mumbai
High Court
26 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City, Mumbai v. Indian Express Newspapers,(Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd.express Towers, Nariman Point,Mumbai
Date of order
26 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City, Mumbai v. Indian Express Newspapers,(Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd.express Towers, Nariman Point,Mumbai, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.INCOME TAX APPLICATION No.226/2002.
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City, Mumbai.
..Applicant.
Vs.
Indian Express Newspapers,(Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd.Express Towers, Nariman Point,Mumbai.
..Respondent.
Mr Ashok Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan forthe Applicant.
Mr P.S. Pardiwala with Vinayak Shetye & AmitJoshi i/b Ms Poorvi Kamani for Respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:26TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C.:-
1.
Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant and the learned counsel for the
respondent.
2.
The above matter is pertaining to the
that the applicant has not carried the matter
further and accepted the same.
3.Under the aforesaid matter, we are not
inclined to grant this application. Hence,the application stands dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue