In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai City Xx, Mumbai v. M/S. Fancy Creations, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 256 of 2003
The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Mumbai City XX, Mumbai
: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Fancy Creations
: Respondents
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan Advocate for appellant
Mr. S.J. Mehta Advocate for respondents
Coram : Dr.S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date: 23.7.2008
withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible court
fees be refunded as per the rules.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr.S. Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.