The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S Phil Corporation Ltd.,Mapusa-Goa
High Court
17 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S Phil Corporation Ltd.,Mapusa-Goa
Date of order
17 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S Phil Corporation Ltd.,Mapusa-Goa, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2004
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,PANAJI-GOA. VersusM/S PHIL CORPORATION LTD.,MAPUSA-GOA.
... Appellant
... Respondent
Shri S.R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Appellants.Shri M.S. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondent.
P.C.:
-Coram:A. P. DESHPANDE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:17th October, 2008
This Tax Appeal was to be heard and decided together with TaxAppeal No. 36/2002, as both the appeals involved identical questions. However, Tax Appeal No. 36/2002 has been disposed of by an orderdated 5/09/2005. The Tax Appeal arose out of an assessment order madeunder Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Subsequent to the filingof the appeal the regular assessment order has been passed by theAssessing Officer and the order under Section 143(1)(a) has merged in thesaid assessment order. This factual position is undisputed. The learnedCounsel appearing for the respective parties agree that the substantialquestion of law framed in the appeal is not required to be answered as it isrendered academic, in view of passing of the regular assessment order. Leaving open all questions and contentions, of both sides, raised in theappeal, we dispose of the appeal as infructuous. No orders as to costs.
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
NH
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.