The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S V.m.salgaoncar Sales Intenational,Vasco Da Gam
High Court
02 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S V.m.salgaoncar Sales Intenational,Vasco Da Gam
Date of order
02 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Panaji-Goa v. M/S V.m.salgaoncar Sales Intenational,Vasco Da Gam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2003
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,PANAJI-GOA. VersusM/S V.M.SALGAONCAR SALES INTENATIONAL,VASCO DA GAM
... Appellant
... Respondent
Shri S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the Respondent.
P.C.
-Coram:P. B. MAJMUDAR &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:2nd February, 2009
It is pointed out to the Court that the tax effect in the matter is forRs.2,89,117/- and as per the policy decision taken by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, no appeal is to be filed when the tax effect is less thanRs.4,00,000/-. It is pointed out that as per the decision in the earliermatter, such Circular will be applicable to the pending cases as well. Inview of the fact that the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, the appeal isdismissed.
P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.
arp/*
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.