Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Salem v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Salem v. M/S.ramachandra Hatcheries, Salem-6

High Court 02 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Salem v. M/S.ramachandra Hatcheries, Salem-6
Date of order
02 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Salem v. M/S.ramachandra Hatcheries, Salem-6, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: For Appellant : Mr.J.NarayanaswamyFor Respondent : Mr.R.Thiagarajan, SC for M/s.M.Muthappan JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J This appeal was admitted on 10.7.2007 on the following substantial questions of law : "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income T...

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed on the basis of the said circular without going into the questions of law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 02.2.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN The Commissioner of Income Tax,Salem....Appellant Vs M/s.Ramachandra Hatcheries, Salem-6....Respondent APPEAL under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the order dated 24.2.2006 made in I.T.A.No.149/Mds/2001 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.J.NarayanaswamyFor Respondent : Mr.R.Thiagarajan, SC for M/s.M.Muthappan JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J This appeal was admitted on 10.7.2007 on the following substantial questions of law : "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in applying the ratio of the Supreme Court judgment in Sushila Rani Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [(2002) 253 ITR 775], when there are no reopening of assessment in this case ? and (2) V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,JANDN.KIRUBAKARAN,J RS (ii) Whether the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme declaration filed after the order was passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and no appeal was pending before the Authorities is valid in law ?" 2. Heard Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Standing Counsel for the Department and Mr.R.Thiagarajan, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. 3. As per the original order of assessment dated 20.1.2000, the total income assessed by the Department itself was Rs.12,07,370/-. The income tax and surcharge calculated on the same was Rs.5,40,910/-. 4. Therefore, the case is covered by the recent circular in Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The case on hand does not fall under anyone of the four exceptions indicated in paragraph 8 of the said circular. 5. Hence, the appeal is dismissed on the basis of the said circular without going into the questions of law. No costs. Internet : Yes 02.2.2016 To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai. T.C.A.No.707 of 2007
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan