The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu-I, Madras v. M/S.tvs Finance & Services Ltd.,Chennai-6
High Court
01 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu-I, Madras v. M/S.tvs Finance & Services Ltd.,Chennai-6
Date of order
01 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu-I, Madras v. M/S.tvs Finance & Services Ltd.,Chennai-6, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes in circular No.21/ 2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax case appeal is dismissed, leaving open the questions of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 01.2.2016
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN
T.C.A.No.1264 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu-I, Madras....Appellant
Vs
M/s.TVS Finance & Services Ltd.,Chennai-6.
...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the order
of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Chennai dated 15.12.2006 passed in Int. T.A.No.21/Mds/2004.
For Appellant : Mr.M.SwaminathanFor Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for
M/s.Subbaraya Iyer & Padmanabhan
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J
Though the appeal was admitted way back on 1.10.2007 on two questions of law, the monetary value of the appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. In view of the circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes in circular No.21/ 2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax case appeal is dismissed, leaving open the questions of law. No costs.
01.2.2016
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,JANDN.KIRUBAKARAN,JRS
Internet : Yes
ToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Chennai
TCA.No.1264 of 2007
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.