Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nad...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu Iii, Madras v. Dr.m.g.muthu

High Court 09 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu Iii, Madras v. Dr.m.g.muthu
Date of order
09 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu Iii, Madras v. Dr.m.g.muthu, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the above tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 09.3.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN Tax Case Appeal No.1476 of 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Tamil Nadu III, Madras....Appellant Vs Dr.M.G.Muthu ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25.5.2007 made in I.T.A.No.2780/Mds/2005 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 1997-98. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J Since the addition made by the Commissioner was to the tune of only Rs.9,20,000/-, tax effect of this appeal is less than the ceiling limit prescribed in Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. (2) V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,JANDN.KIRUBAKARAN,JRS 2. Accordingly, the above tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The question of law is left unanswered. Internet : Yes 09.3.2016 ToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai. TCA.No.1476 of 2007
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan