Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds v. M/S.indian Electrical & Electronics

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds v. M/S.indian Electrical & Electronics
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds v. M/S.indian Electrical & Electronics, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1243 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax(TDS)...Appellant Vs. M/s.Indian Electrical & Electronics Manufacturers Association ..Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr.B.Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . By order dated 4th October, 2004 the ITAT dismissed the Appeal filed by the Revenue for the assessment year 1996-97 and 1998-99 by holding that there was no liability on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act. 2. The Revenue had preferred an Appeal against the quantum order for the assessment year 1996-97 being Income Tax Appeal No.273 of 2001. That Appeal has been dismissed on 28th January, 2008. Considering the above the present Appeal would not be maintainable considering the dismissal of the quantum Appeal. Appeal dismissed accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan