The Commissioner Of Income Taxtiruchirapalli v. M/S.kathirvel & Co.,B
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxtiruchirapalli v. M/S.kathirvel & Co.,B
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxtiruchirapalli v. M/S.kathirvel & Co.,B, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.1.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal Nos.672 and 673 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxTiruchirapalli
.. Appellant in both the appeals
Versus
M/s.Kathirvel & Co.,B-40, Gandhigramam ColonyPasupathipalayamKarur – 639 001
.. Respondent in both the appeals
Prayer IN TCA No.672 of 2007: Appeal has been filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, Chennai, dated 27.10.2006 passed in I.T.A.No.773(Mds)/2000.
Prayer IN TCA No.673 of 2007: Appeal has been filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, Chennai, dated 27.10.2006 passed in I.T.A.No.2138(Mds)/2003.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : No Appearance
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeals, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeals, if it is found that they had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though they fall under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeals, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeals, if it is found that they had
been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though they fall under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/Nolan
(M.J.J.,) (S.V.J.,)25-1-2016
Note: Issue order copy on 28.1.2016.
To:
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, Chennai
4
M.JAICHANDREN,J.ANDS.VIMALA,J.
lan
Tax Case Appeal Nos.672 and 673 of 2007
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.