The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box
High Court
04 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box
Date of order
04 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Issue: The ITAT has only directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain whether the entire amount of Rs.6.42 Crore represents only loan creditors.
Decision: Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
TCA No. 295 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income TaxTrichy.
.. Appellant
Vs
Trichy Steel Rolling Mills LtdPost Box No.603SenthannipuramTrichy – 639 002... Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “C” Bench, dated 22.5.2015 in ITA.No.834/Mds/2014.
For Appellant(s):Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Sr.Standing Counsel
For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Sriraman
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the Income Tax
__________
Page 1 of 4
TCA No.295 of 2016
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that is impugned in this appeal. The ITAT has only directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain whether the entire amount of Rs.6.42 Crore represents only loan creditors.
2. Mr.Narayanaswamy says that he would have been happy if the
ITAT had only remanded the matter to ascertain the same, but the ITAT has also given a finding that if the entire amount is pertaining to sundry creditors, then it cannot be subject to income tax.
3. As the Assessing Officer is yet to ascertain, we keep all rights and contentions open.
Appeal is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 04.06.2025
Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi
__________
Page 2 of 4
1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment Tiruchirapalli – 620 001. No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment Tiruchirapalli – 620 001.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-I(1), Tiruchirapalli. Circle-I(1), Tiruchirapalli.
__________
Page 3 of 4
__________
Page 4 of 4
TCA No.295 of 2016
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J.
(sasi)
TCA No. 295 of 2016
04.06.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.