Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v....

The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box

High Court 04 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box
Date of order
04 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy v. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltdpost Box, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Issue: The ITAT has only directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain whether the entire amount of Rs.6.42 Crore represents only loan creditors.

Decision: Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.06.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No. 295 of 2016 The Commissioner of Income TaxTrichy. .. Appellant Vs Trichy Steel Rolling Mills LtdPost Box No.603SenthannipuramTrichy – 639 002... Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “C” Bench, dated 22.5.2015 in ITA.No.834/Mds/2014. For Appellant(s):Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Sr.Standing Counsel For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Sriraman JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the Income Tax __________ Page 1 of 4 TCA No.295 of 2016 Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that is impugned in this appeal. The ITAT has only directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain whether the entire amount of Rs.6.42 Crore represents only loan creditors. 2. Mr.Narayanaswamy says that he would have been happy if the ITAT had only remanded the matter to ascertain the same, but the ITAT has also given a finding that if the entire amount is pertaining to sundry creditors, then it cannot be subject to income tax. 3. As the Assessing Officer is yet to ascertain, we keep all rights and contentions open. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 04.06.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi __________ Page 2 of 4 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment Tiruchirapalli – 620 001. No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment Tiruchirapalli – 620 001. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-I(1), Tiruchirapalli. Circle-I(1), Tiruchirapalli. __________ Page 3 of 4 __________ Page 4 of 4 TCA No.295 of 2016 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J. (sasi) TCA No. 295 of 2016 04.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan