In The Commissioner Of Income Taxviii, Mumbai v. M/S. Associated Cables Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.888 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxVIII, Mumbai
: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Associated Cables Pvt.Ltd.: Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar Advocate for Appellant
Mr. A.P. Sathe Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 27.8.2008
P.C.
these circumstances we are not inclined to entertain
above appeal. Appeal is dismissed.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.