The Commissioner Of Income v. Tax …

mukund IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO.8 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Versus Tax … Appellant. Barton Firtop Engg. (India) Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITHTax Appeal No.9/2009Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITHTax Appeal No.24/2010Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.WITHTax Appeal No.17/2017Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITH Tax Appeal No.1/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITH Tax Appeal No.2/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. S Redkar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.5/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITHTax Appeal No.6/2018Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITH Tax Appeal No.10/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITHTax Appeal No.11/2018Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITH Tax Appeal No.71/2017Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITHTax Appeal No.110/2017Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.WITH mukund 3 txa8/2009 & connected matters dt.4.10.18 Tax Appeal No.111/2017Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. WITHTax Appeal No.112/2017Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr.S.R.Rivankar with Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.49/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Gurang D.Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.50/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Gurang D.Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.51/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Gurang D.Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.53/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. Gurang D.Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. WITH Tax Appeal No.54/2018 Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Gurang D.Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram : N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. Date : 4 October 2018. mukund 4 txa8/2009 & connected matters dt.4.10.18 P.C.: The learned Standing Counsel appearing for theAppellant states that the effect of the CBDT Circular dated 11 July2018 has been examined in respect of these Appeals wherein the taxeffect is below the stipulated limit. The learned Standing Counselstates that instructions have been received from the Appellant towithdraw the Appeals, in view of the Circular. The learned StandingCounsel states that a Public Interest Litigation is pending in the ApexCourt challenging the Circular dated 11 July 2018 and thewithdrawal be made, subject to the outcome of the Petition.Accordingly, the Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn, subject to theabove. Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.N.M. Jamdar, J.