The Commissioner Of Incometax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India
High Court
24 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India
Date of order
24 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.406 OF 2011
The Commissioner of IncomeTax-18, Mumbai.
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. Jewel of India.
..Respondent.
....
Mr. D.K. Kamwal, for the Appellant.Mr. J.D. Mistri, Sr. Counsel a/w. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
....
P.C.
CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24th JANUARY, 2012.
1.Counsel for the Revenue states that the question raised in this Appeal is answered against the Revenue in assessee's own case by the decisions of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos.343/2011 & 355/2011 decided on 13th January, 2012. In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue