The Commissioner Of Incometax 2 Mumbai v. M/S Tata Projects Ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax 2 Mumbai v. M/S Tata Projects Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax 2 Mumbai v. M/S Tata Projects Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3872 OF 2006
in
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2312 of 2002
in
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2006
The Commissioner of IncomeTax 2 Mumbai.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s Tata Projects Ltd.. Respondents
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan with Ms.P.P.Bhosale for AppellantNone for Respondents
P.C.
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 28th April, 2008
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 698 days delay caused in filing theappeal. The appeal is against the order dated11th June, 2004 passed by the I.T.A.T. Mumbai.Perused the affidavit in support of the notice ofmotion. The Commissioner of Income Tax hadgranted approval for filing an appeal on 17thNovember, 2004 and the appeal came to be filed on13th November, 2006. We are not satisfied withthe reasons given for condonation of delay. Thereasons given for delay that of getting the draft
memo of appeal prepared and non-availability ofcourt fee stamps etc does not appear to bejustifiable. No sufficient cause is made out forcondonation of delay. Hence, notice of motionstands dismissed.
In view of dismissal of the notice of motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2312 of 2006 also standsdismissed.
(A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.