Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Incometax (Central v...

The Commissioner Of Incometax (Central v. M/S. Murli Agro Products Ltd.)And

High Court 03 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

03 Mar 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Incometax (Central v. M/S. Murli Agro Products Ltd.)And, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPURINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2009 -(The Commissioner of Incometax (Central) vs. M/s. Murli Agro Products Ltd.)AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2009 -(The Commissioner of Incometax (Central) vs. M/s. Murli Agro Products Ltd.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. MARCH 03, 2015. Heard Shri Parchure, learned counsel for theappellant and Shri Bhattad, learned counsel for therespondent. These appeals arise out of common orderdated 05.01.2009 delivered by the Income-Tax AppellateTribunal (I.T.A.T.) in three matters. Third appeal i.e.Income Tax Appeal No. 36 of 2009 has been dismissedby this Court on 29.10.2010. It is, therefore, apparentthat the questions sought to be urged are already lookedinto and found without any merit on 29.10.2010. Assuch, the present challenge is squarely covered by thatadjudication. Accordingly, in the light of orders dated29.10.2010 in ITL No. 36 of 2009, the present Appealsare also disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS. JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.