Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur...

The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur v. Shri Anilkumar Jayantilal Agrawal Vora

High Court 25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

25 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur v. Shri Anilkumar Jayantilal Agrawal Vora, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 21 of 2015dated 10.12.2015, Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.The Registry to refund proportionate courtfee to the appellant. *GS.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2007 -(The Commissioner of IncomeTax I, Nagpur vs. Shri Anilkumar Jayantilal Agrawal Vora, Prop.Jayantilal Dwarkadas, Akola) Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.JANUARY 25, 2016. Heard Shri Parchure and Shri Mohta,learned counsel for the appellant – department and ShriThakkar, learned counsel for the respondent –assessee. The relevant Block period is 1991-92 to2001-02 and the tax effect is Rs.2,09,825/- only. Assuch, in the light of C.B.D.T. Circular No. 21 of 2015dated 10.12.2015, Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.The Registry to refund proportionate courtfee to the appellant. *GS. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.